Technical debt is one of the major problems encountered by developers while designing and developing software. According to experts, this is because of the adaptation of new development styles that have come into the feature, nowadays. The software industry’s emphasis on rapid application development, as required to maintain business agility, has exacerbated the problem of technical debt. Quick implementations of micro services, containers, digital transformations, etc. are the activities leading to Development operations teams encountering severe technical debt management issues. Software technical debt is on the verge of reaching epidemic proportions because of the industry’s focus on taking short-cuts in developing new software to meet the requirements of the customers.
Origin of Technical Debt
Poor technical debt management is a problematic byproduct of agile and iterative development styles adopted in projects such as micro-services and containers. As you fix iteration deadlines, not many people have time to clean up the mess called technical debt. Most of the programmers are facing enormous levels of code staring at their faces. You create Technical debt because of the hurry to sell the software in the market. Another crucial fact is that overworked software engineers commit mistakes in code. So, all of these factors contribute to technical debt.
Curtailing Technical Debt
All in all, handling technical debt management in an efficient manner requires software firms to relax product delivery deadlines and put a stop to implementing new technologies like micro-services and containers. Overall, the quality of software must be made more vital to running the businesses than the speed of deployment. Moreover, using technology which does not function in an appropriate way is damaging for a business’ reputation. Technical debt is the outcome when the speed of accomplishing a task is given priority over software quality.
Causes of Technical Debt
Exhausted software engineers looking to complete work on strict deadlines commit mistakes which in turn further deteriorates the quality of the software. A sign indicating that the developers are overworked and fatigued is the turn-over at a firm. This represents the “human side” of technical debt. Developers would not like to work at an organization which does not value quality software projects and are consistently on the lookout to avoid technical failure, shying away from introducing innovative projects. To provide more details on this topic, the reader can click here, to gain further detailed knowledge.
Use of Refactoring
Continuous refactoring may lead to best-in-class applications. But you will lag having state-of-the-art applications. Ultimately, to stay ahead in the race, you cannot rely wholly on refactoring; you will require consistently migrating and transforming your code. This implies that when you release any new application, you will require to instantly starting a brand new project to refactor. It is imperative to modernize the application you just constructed and released to enable you to continue being a pro. Gradually increasing steps to adopting maintenance will no more prove to be adequate. You will have to consistently build and do away with technologies as they lag behind the technology curve. Thus the need of the hour is to adopt to a new software development paradigm while designing a software project.